Despite its infamous reputation, the
Atari 2600's E.T. game is much more of a complete, playable, and somewhat entertaining game than
Big Rigs. (Whilst hardly a great game, the
Atari 2600's E.T. game is far from being the worst video game of all time!)
E.T.'s major issues were simply placing the pits too close to the screen edges (making falling into the pits too frequent and frustrating of an issue), making levitation too tedious (making escaping the pits too frustrating of an experience), and not adequately explaining how to play the game to its users. People often claim that E.T. is "broken and unplayable," but in truth
they really just don't know how to play it and were unwilling to learn and give it a proper chance.
Conversely,
Big Rigs' issues are more plentiful and serious.
A racing game in which your opponent cannot move, the player passes through any and all objects, and the player can exceed Warp 10 when in reverse is clearly far less complete and is by no means market ready! (Unless the game's plot was that you're playing a big rig's ghost, not beholden to the physical laws of corporeal spacetime--which as far as I understand wasn't the case!) Unlike the
Atari 2600's E.T. game,
Big Rigs actually is literally broken and unplayable!
So, given the above, I believe that the comparison between these two games goes beyond a mere matter of subjective taste:
Big Rigs is objectively a worse game than the
Atari 2600's E.T.!